Utilization of and perceived need for simulators in clinical electrophysiology: results from an EHRA physician survey.

AIMS: Simulator training has been recently introduced in electrophysiology (EP) programmes in order to improve catheter manipulation skills without complication risks. The aim of this study is to survey the current use of EP simulators and the perceived need for these tools in clinical training and practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 20-item online questionnaire developed by the Scientific Initiatives Committee of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) in collaboration with EHRA Digital Committee was disseminated through the EHRA Scientific Research Network members, national EP groups, and social media platforms. Seventy-four respondents from 22 countries (73% males; 50% under 40 years old) completed the survey. Despite being perceived as useful among EP professionals (81%), EP simulators are rarely a part of the institutional cardiology training programme (20%) and only 18% of the respondents have an EP simulator at their institution. When available, simulators are mainly used in EP to train transseptal puncture, ablation, and mapping, followed by device implantation (cardiac resynchronization therapy [CRT], leadless, and conduction system pacing [CSP]). Almost all respondents (96%) believe that simulator programmes should be a part of the routine institutional EP training, hopefully developed by EHRA, in order to improve the efficacy and safety of EP procedures and in particular CSP 58%, CRT 42%, leadless pacing 38%, or complex arrhythmia ablations (VT 58%, PVI 45%, and PVC 42%). CONCLUSION: This current EHRA survey identified a perceived need but a lack of institutional simulator programme access for electrophysiologists who could benefit from it in order to speed up the learning curve process and reduce complications of complex EP procedures.

Novel Radiofrequency Balloon Catheter　- Impact of Ablation Parameters on Single-Shot Isolation.

BACKGROUND: A novel multielectrode radiofrequency balloon (RFB) catheter has been released for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).Methods and Results: In this observational study consecutive patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing first-time PVI were enrolled in 2 high-volume ablation centers. All procedures were conducted in conjunction with a 3D-mapping system. Clinical, procedural and ablation parameters were systematically analyzed. 105 patients (58% male; 52% paroxysmal AF, 68±11.3 years mean age, left atrial volume index 38.6±14.8 mL/m2) were included. 241/412 (58.5%) PVs were successfully isolated with a single shot (SS), with a time-to-isolation of 11.6±8 s. Total number of radiofrequency applications was 892 (mean 2.2/PV), resulting in successful isolation of 408/412 (99%) PVs at the end of the procedure. Mean electrodes' impedance drop was significantly higher in the SS-PVI compared with non-SS applications (21.5±6.6 vs. 18.6±6.5 Ohm). Concordantly, higher temperature rise was observed in the SS vs. non-SS applications (10.9±4.9℃ vs. 9.6±4.7℃). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter real-world study, mean impedance drop and temperature rise were associated with successful SS-PVI applying the novel RFB catheter. These parameters may help to guide efficient usage of the new RF balloon.

EUropean real-world outcomes with Pulsed field ablatiOn in patients with symptomatic atRIAl fibrillation: lessons from the multi-centre EU-PORIA registry.

AIMS: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a new, non-thermal ablation modality for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The multi-centre EUropean Real World Outcomes with Pulsed Field AblatiOn in Patients with Symptomatic AtRIAl Fibrillation (EU-PORIA) registry sought to determine the safety, efficacy, and learning curve characteristics for the pentaspline, multi-electrode PFA catheter. METHODS AND RESULTS: All-comer AF patients from seven high-volume centres were consecutively enrolled. Procedural and follow-up data were collected. Learning curve effects were analysed by operator ablation experience and primary ablation modality. In total, 1233 patients (61% male, mean age 66 ± 11years, 60% paroxysmal AF) were treated by 42 operators. In 169 patients (14%), additional lesions outside the PVs were performed, most commonly at the posterior wall (n = 127). Median procedure and fluoroscopy times were 58 (interquartile range: 40-87) and 14 (9-21) min, respectively, with no differences due to operator experience. Major complications occurred in 21/1233 procedures (1.7%) including pericardial tamponade (14; 1.1%) and transient ischaemic attack or stroke (n = 7; 0.6%), of which one was fatal. Prior cryoballoon users had less complication. At a median follow-up of 365 (323-386) days, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of arrhythmia-free survival was 74% (80% for paroxysmal and 66% for persistent AF). Freedom from arrhythmia was not influenced by operator experience. In 149 (12%) patients, a repeat procedure was performed due to AF recurrence and 418/584 (72%) PVs were durably isolated. CONCLUSION: The EU-PORIA registry demonstrates a high single-procedure success rate with an excellent safety profile and short procedure times in a real-world, all-comer AF patient population.

Pulsed Field Versus Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation: Efficacy, Safety, and Long-Term Follow-Up in a 400-Patient Cohort.

BACKGROUND: The cryoballoon (CB) represents the gold standard single-shot device for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Single-shot pulsed field PVI ablation (nonthermal, cardiac tissue selective) has recently entered the arena. We sought to compare procedural data and long-term outcome of both techniques. METHODS: Consecutive AF patients who underwent pulsed field ablation (PFA) and CB-based PVI were enrolled. CB PVI was performed using the second-generation 28-mm CB; PFA was performed using a 31/35-mm pentaspline catheter. Success was defined as freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia after a 3-month blanking period. RESULTS: Four hundred patients were included (56.5% men; 60.8% paroxysmal AF; age 70 [interquartile range, 59-77] years), 200 in each group (CB and PFA), and baseline characteristics did not differ. Acute PVI was achieved in 100% of PFA and in 98% (196/200) of CB patients (P=0.123; 4 touch-up ablations). Median procedure time was significantly shorter in PFA (34.5 [29-40] minutes) versus CB (50 [45-60] minutes; P<0.001), fluoroscopy time was similar. Overall procedural complications were 6.5% in CB and 3.0% in PFA (P=0.1), driven by a higher rate of phrenic nerve palsies using CB. The 1-year success rates in paroxysmal AF (CB, 83.1%; PFA, 80.3%; P=0.724) and persistent AF (CB, 71%; PFA, 66.8%; P=0.629) were similar for both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: PFA compared with CB PVI shows a similar procedural efficacy but is associated with shorter procedure time and no phrenic nerve palsies. Importantly, 12-month clinical success rates are favorable but not different between both groups.

Catheter ablation induced phrenic nerve palsy by pulsed field ablation-completely impossible? A case series.

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a new feasible and safe method for the ablative treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation (AF). Through the use of electric fields, it causes pore-like openings in the cell's wall, leading to cell death. The most appealing characteristic of this new technique is its selectivity for cardiomyocytes and consequently its low risk of collateral damage to extracardiac tissues. We present three cases of a PFA-induced transient phrenic nerve (PN) injury documented during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Case summaries: Three patients aged 55-81 years underwent PFA for symptomatic AF. Cases 1 and 3 were affected by paroxysmal AF without evidence of structural heart disease. Case 2 had persistent AF and ischaemic cardiomyopathy with preserved ejection fraction. We observed a transient right hemidiaphragm palsy during the delivery of impulses in the right superior pulmonary vein (Cases 1 and 2) and in the right inferior pulmonary vein (Case 3). The palsy lasted <1 min and was followed by spontaneous full recovery in all cases. Discussion: Transient PN dysfunction can be observed following PFA in AF ablation. According to our initial experience, a full recovery of the PN function can be expected within seconds. We hypothesize a hyperpolarization of neuronal cells or a depletion of acetylcholine in the motoric endplate to explain this event. Further studies are required to understand the exact pathophysiological mechanism.

First pulse field ablation of an incessant atrial tachycardia from the right atrial appendage.

We report a case of an incessant atrial tachycardia from the right atrial appendage that was effectively treated with pulsed field ablation after two failed radio frequency ablation attempts.

Impact of body mass index on cryoablation of atrial fibrillation: Patient characteristics, procedural data, and long-term outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Ablation of atrial fibrillation in the context of obesity can be challenging. We sought to evaluate the role of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (CB-PVI) in obese patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Patients with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and symptomatic AF who underwent CB-PVI were retrospectively enrolled. Three groups were defined (G1: BMI of 25-29 kg/m2 ; G2: BMI of 30-34 kg/m2 ; G3: BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 ). RESULTS: 600 patients were included (59% male; 66 ± 11 years old); 337, 149, and 114 were assigned to G1, G2, and G3, respectively. Acute procedural success was recorded in 99.7% of patients. Procedural and fluoroscopy time were comparable but the radiation dose was significantly higher in G3. Procedural complications were 3% in G1, 5.4% in G2, and 8.8% in G3 (p = .01). The overall freedom from AF after 1-year was 77%. G3 had a significantly worse 1-year success rate compared to G1 and G2 (G3: 66.5% vs. G1: 78.4%; p = .015 and vs. G2: 82.5%; p = .008) with reduced 1-year success in paroxysmal AF (G1: 84.0%; G2: 86.3%; and G3: 69.6%) but not in persistent AF (G1: 68.7%; G2: 77.4%; and G3: 62.1%). G3 showed similar success rates irrespective of AF form (PAF: 69.6% vs. persAF 62.1%; p = .501). CONCLUSION: Cryoballoon ablation in obese patients can be effective with an acceptable safety profile, 77% of patients were in stable SR at 1 year. Severe obese patients (BMI ≥ 35) showed reduced procedural safety and 1-year success rate. In association with life style modification, CB ablation may represent a strategy to enhance rhythm control in the context of obesity.

Cryoballoon Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Concomitant Heart Failure and Either Reduced or Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Results From the Cryo AF Global Registry.

Background Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) often coexist; yet, outcomes of ablation in patients with AF and concomitant HF are limited. This analysis assessed outcomes of cryoablation in patients with AF and HF. Methods and Results The Cryo AF Global Registry is a prospective, multicenter registry of patients with AF who were treated with cryoballoon ablation according to routine practice at 56 sites in 26 countries. Patients with baseline New York Heart Association class I to III (HF cohort) were compared with patients without HF. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence ≥30 seconds, safety, and health care utilization over 12-month follow-up were analyzed. A total of 1303 patients (318 HF) were included. Patients with HF commonly had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (81.6%), were more often women (45.6% versus 33.6%) with persistent AF (25.8% versus 14.3%), and had a larger left atrial diameter (4.4±0.9 versus 4.0±0.7 cm). Serious procedure-related complications occurred in 4.1% of patients with HF and 2.6% of patients without HF (P=0.188). Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence was not different between cohorts with either paroxysmal AF (84.2% [95% CI, 78.6-88.4] versus 86.8% [95% CI, 84.2-89.0]) or persistent AF (69.6% [95% CI, 58.1-78.5] versus 71.8% [95% CI, 63.2-78.7]) (P=0.319). After ablation, a reduction in AF-related symptoms and antiarrhythmic drug use was observed in both cohorts (HF and no-HF), and freedom from repeat ablation was not different between cohorts. Persistent AF and HF predicted a post-ablation cardiovascular rehospitalization (P=0.032 and P=0.001, respectively). Conclusions Cryoablation to treat patients with AF is similarly effective at 12 months in patients with and without HF. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT02752737.

Safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal and persistent AF in a real-world global setting: Results from the Cryo AF Global Registry.

BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon ablation is a commonly used approach to treat patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: Report on the safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of AF in the largest global cohort of cryoablated patients prospectively studied within a single registry. METHODS: The Cryo AF Global Registry is a prospective, multi-center registry. Patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) or persistent AF (PsAF) were treated with the cryoballoon catheter according to routine practices at 93 sites across 36 countries. Primary efficacy endpoints included freedom from AF and freedom from AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia (AT) ≥30 seconds. The primary safety endpoint was serious device- or procedure-related adverse events over 12 month follow-up. RESULTS: During this evaluation window, 2922 subjects completed an index cryoballoon procedure, and 1440 completed 12 month follow-up. The cohort was 61 ± 12 years of age, 36.3% female, and 78.7% PAF. Serious device- and procedure-related adverse event rates were 1.5% and 3.4%, respectively. Freedom from AF/AFL/AT after the 90 day blanking period was 86.4% (95% CI: 84.3%-88.3%) in patients with PAF and 70.9% (95% CI: 64.6%-76.4%) in patients with PsAF. Freedom from AF/AFL/AT in first-line PAF and PsAF was 90.0% (95% CI: 86.4%-92.7%) and 72.9% (95% CI: 58.6%-83.0%) at 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Cryo Global AF Registry is the largest evaluation to demonstrate cryoablation is an efficient, safe, and effective treatment for patients with AF worldwide. Cryoablation was commonly used to treat patients prior to an AAD failure and may facilitate earlier therapy for patients on the AF disease continuum.

Safety of cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: First European results from the cryo AF Global Registry.

BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has been utilized in Europe for >15 years. OBJECTIVES: Report patient and procedural characteristics that influence the safety of cryoablation for the treatment of AF. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the prospective, multicenter Cryo AF Global Registry were treated at 38 European centers. Freedom from a ≥30s episode of AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia (AT) at 12-months and serious complications were analyzed. Univariate and multivariable models identified baseline patient and procedural characteristics that predicted a procedure-related complication. RESULTS: Of the 1418 subjects who completed an index procedure, the cohort was 62 ± 11 years of age, 37.7% female, and 72.2% paroxysmal AF (PAF). The mean procedure, left atrial dwell, and fluoroscopy times were 81 ± 34, 54 ± 25, and 14 ± 13 min, respectively. Among the 766 patients with 12-month follow-up, freedom from a ≥30 s AF/AFL/AT recurrence was 83.3% (95% CI: 79.8%-86.3%) and 71.6% (95% CI: 64.6%-77.4%) in patients with PAF and persistent AF. The serious procedure- and device-related adverse event rates were 4.7% and 2.0%. No baseline patient characteristic independently predicted a procedure-related adverse event; however, prolonged procedure duration (OR = 1.01 [95% CI: 1.00-1.01]), use of general anesthesia (OR = 1.71 [95% CI: 1.01-2.92]), and delivery of a cavotricuspid isthmus line (OR = 3.04 [95% CI: 1.01-9.20]) were each independently associated with the occurrence of a serious procedural safety event (all p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Cryoballoon ablation is safe and effective in real-world use across a broad cohort of patients with AF.

What Does the Future Hold?: Ideal Device, Newer Devices, and More.

Please verify if "pigtail guided" should be "pigtail catheter-guided": Recent design changes for left atrial appendage (LAA) closure devices have led to significant improvement by facilitating the procedural workflow (no need for pigtail guided LAA intubation), moving the workspace from distal LAA to the landing zone (closed distal end design), and improving device stability (different anchor design). The availability of different device types (plug vs disc-lobe design) offers an option to tailor a device type to a patient's anatomy; thereby, sealing results have improved substantially. The issue of device-related thrombus has not been resolved and deserves future research, with the goal of eliminating postprocedural antithrombotic medication without increasing risk for stroke.

Thromboembolism after electrical isolation of the left atrial appendage: a new indication for interventional closure?

AIMS: Left atrial appendage electrical isolation (LAAI) may improve the rhythm outcome in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Controversy exists if LAAI is associated with an increased rate of thromboembolic complications. We sought to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of interventional left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in comparison to oral anticoagulation (OAC) after electrical LAAI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Weeks after index LAAI using the cryoballoon or a linear maze like ablation strategy patients' left atrial appendage was invasively remapped. In case of persistent LAAI, LAAC was performed. Patients who refused invasive remapping continued OAC. The primary endpoint was composed of any stroke or systemic embolism (SE) and the occurrence of intracardiac thrombus. Secondary endpoints included stroke/SE, major bleeding, and all-cause death. Of 166 patients (51% female; mean age 70 ± 8 years; mean CHAD2S2VASc score 3.4 ± 1.8) after LAAI, 94 patients received LAAC (LAAC group) and 72 continued OAC (no LAAC). After LAAC, 83% of patients received dual antiplatelet therapy for 6 weeks and aspirin thereafter. During a mean follow-up of 778 ± 630 days, 5 and 11 primary endpoint events were observed in the LAAC and no LAAC group, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10-0.75; P = 0.010]. The calculated annual thromboembolic event rates were 6.9% (no LAAC) and 2.3% (LAAC), respectively. Left atrial appendage closure significantly reduced the incidence of stroke and SE (HR 0.31, CI 0.1-0.98; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: After electrical LAAI for rhythm control in AF patients, interventional LAAC was associated with fewer thromboembolic complications when compared with OAC.

First-line catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: outcome of radiofrequency vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation.

AIMS: First-line ablation prior to antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy is an option for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF); however, the optimal ablation technique, radiofrequency (RF), or cryoballoon (CB) has to be determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: The FREEZE Cohort Study compares RF and CB ablation. Treatment-naïve patients were documented in the FREEZEplus Registry. Periprocedural data and outcome were analysed. From 2011 to 2014, a total of 373/4184 (8.9%) patients with PAF naïve to AAD were identified. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed with RF (n = 180) or CB (n = 193). In the RF group, patients were older (65 vs. 61 years, P < 0.01) compared with the CB group. The procedure time was significantly shorter and radiation exposure higher in the CB group. Major adverse events occurred in 1.6% (CB) and 3.7% (RF) of patients (P = 0.22). AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence until discharge was 4.5% (RF) and 8.5% (CB, P = 0.2). Follow-up (FU) ≥12 months was available in 99 (RF) and 107 (CB) patients. After 1.4 years of FU, freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) was 61% (RF) and 71% (CB, P = 0.11). In the RF group, more patients underwent cardioversion, and a trend for more repeat ablations was observed. Persistent phrenic nerve palsy was observed in one patient treated by CB. CONCLUSION: First-line ablation for PAF is safe and effective with either RF or CB. The procedure was faster with the CB, but the radiation exposure was higher. Although there was a trend for more recurrences and complications in the RF group, a more favourable risk profile in patients undergoing CB ablation might have biased the results. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01360008.

High rate of durable pulmonary vein isolation after second-generation cryoballoon ablation: analysis of repeat procedures.

AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the first-generation cryoballoon (CB1) was characterized by a high rate of recovered pulmonary vein (PV) conduction along with a typical conduction gap pattern in patients with recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa). Second generation (CB2) enables more uniform freezing. However, the rate of chronic PVI and PV conduction gap pattern is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients with ATa recurrence undergoing a second procedure after CB2 or (historical) CB1 PVI (28 mm) were enrolled. In all patients, a left atrial three-dimensional electronatomic reconstruction was performed. The rates of chronic PVI and localization of PV conduction gaps were determined and compared between CB1 and CB2. Antral PV re-isolation was performed using irrigated-tip radiofrequency current energy ablation. Of 206 patients (CB2), 18 patients underwent the repeat procedure after 192 (75:245) days. In 6 of 18 (33%) patients, all PVs were electrically isolated whereas in the remaining 12 patients (66%) at least one PV demonstrated PV reconduction. Of 71 PVs [1 left common PV (LCPV)], 55 PVs (77%) were chronically isolated. The right superior PV (RSPV) was characterized by the lowest rate of chronic PVI (RSPV: 56%, LSPV: 76%, RIPV: 83%, LIPV: 94%, LCPV: 100%). Compared with CB1, CB2 ablation resulted in a significantly higher rate of chronic PVI (CB2: 77% vs. CB1: 32%; P < 0.0001) with the greatest improvement along both inferior PVs. CONCLUSION: Second-generation cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation is associated with a high rate of durable PVI in patients with ATa recurrence. The RSPV represents the PV with the greatest risk for left atrium-pulmonary vein reconnection.

Antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage closure.

It is important to prevent on-device thrombus formation without increasing the risk for bleeding complications after successful interventional left atrial appendage closure. Therefore, choosing the optimal antithrombotic therapy poses a challenging task. While major clinical studies investigated patients eligible for oral anticoagulation using vitamin K antagonists, the vast majority of implants in 'real life' are performed in patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation after serious bleeding events. In this patient population, strategies using dual antiplatelet therapy were found to be a sound alternative; however, the optimal duration of antithrombotic therapy remains unclear. Future studies will have to investigate the role of direct anticoagulants for post-implant thrombus formation and address the question of whether left atrial appendage closure obviates the need for long-term aspirin therapy.

Differences of two cryoballoon generations: insights from the prospective multicentre, multinational FREEZE Cohort Substudy.

AIMS: Cryoballoon (CB) ablation with the second-generation cryoballoon (CBG2) seems to be more effective than its predecessor [first-generation cryoballoon (CBG1)], but phrenic nerve palsies were observed more frequently. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of CBG1 and CBG2 in a substudy of the prospective multicentre, multinational FREEZE Cohort Study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Periprocedural data were analysed, and a total of 532 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) were examined (n = 224 for CBG1 and n = 308 for CBG2). Procedure time decreased significantly from 149 to 130 min when comparing CBG1 with CBG2 (P < 0.0001), and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was achieved in 97.8 and 97.6% of PVs with CBG1 and CBG2 (P = 0.77), respectively. The need for dual-balloon usage within a procedure dropped (20.1 vs. 9.0%, P < 0.001), and the fluoroscopy time was reduced when operating the CBG2. Atrial fibrillation recurrence rates until discharge were similar (5.0 vs. 5.8%, P = 0.69). Comparable low rates of major complications were observed with both CBs, and there was a non-significant trend for more phrenic nerve palsies. CONCLUSION: Second-generation cryoballoon demonstrated a high rate of acute PVI in a significant faster procedure, which also utilized less radiation exposure and less dual-balloon usage during an average procedure. The safety profile remains favourable with a non-significant trend for more phrenic nerve palsies. If the enhancements lead to a higher clinical benefit has to be determined. The 1-year outcome data from the ongoing FREEZE Cohort Study comparing radiofrequency and CB ablation will shed some light on that issue. CLINICAL TRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01360008.

Endoscopic ablation systems.

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for ablation of atrial fibrillation is a well-accepted therapy option for high symptomatic patients refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs. Radiofrequency point-by-point ablation is the gold-standard technique; however, in the last two decades, many new technologies have been developed. The endoscopic ablation system makes direct PV ostium visualization possible, despite the large anatomy variation thanks to its compliant balloon. The laser generator delivers precise lesions that in the first clinical studies seem to be durable, with a safety and efficacy profile similar to the other PV isolation techniques. If these early results are confirmed by larger clinical studies, the endoscopic ablation system will offer a new paradigm in ablation of cardiac arrhythmias by directly visualizing the target substrate.

Energy titration strategies with the endoscopic ablation system: lessons from the high-dose vs. low-dose laser ablation study.

AIMS: To assess the effects of low-dose (LD) and high-dose (HD) ablation on acute and chronic success in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). While the concept of visually guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been established little is known on energy titration using laser ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 60 patients with AF, PVI using the endoscopic ablation system (EAS) was performed in two groups. Visually guided ablation was carried out after obtaining optimal tissue contact with 5.5-8.5 W in the LD group and with >8.5 W in the HD group. Acute PVI after a single visually guided circular lesion set was achieved in 89% (HD) and 69% (LD), respectively, (P = 0.0004). In 70 and 39% of patients all PVs were isolated after a single ablation circle in the HD and LD group, respectively, (P = 0.009). After gap ablation all PVs were isolated with the EAS. More energy was deployed (6483 ± 1834 vs. 5306 ± 2258 Ws; P ≤ 0.0001) with less applications (31.6 ± 8 vs. 35.2 ± 15 applications per PV; P = 0.03) leading to shorter procedure times (128 ± 17 vs. 154 ± 38 min; P = 0.001). During median follow-up of 311 days (261-346) recurrence rate was 17 and 40% in the HD and LD group, respectively. In both groups one phrenic nerve palsy was observed. CONCLUSION: For the first time, it was demonstrated that high ablation power affects acute and chronic outcomes. High-dose laser balloon ablation allows for an acute PVI rate of 89% solely by visually guided circular ablation and is associated with a chronic success rate of 83% after a single procedure.

Two versus one repeat freeze-thaw cycle(s) after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation: the alster extra pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Repeated freezing (bonus applications) during cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been suggested to improve lesion durability. However, the long-term clinical effects of repeated freezing have not been investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 51 patients (pts) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent PVI using the single big (28 mm) cryoballoon technique. One (27 pts, group I) or 2 bonus applications (24 pts, group II) were performed at all PVs subsequent to PVI. Clinical follow-up consisted of continuous rhythm monitoring by an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM, 24 pts) and serial 7-day Holter-ECG recording (7DH, 27 pts). The primary endpoint was defined as recurrent AF or atrial tachycardia. Acute PVI of all PVs was obtained in 50/51 pts (98%). The median (Q1;Q3) follow-up duration in this study was 384 (213;638) days. The primary endpoint occurred in 48% (group I, 15 pts ICM, 12 pts 7DH) and 46% (group II, 9 pts ICM, 15 pts 7DH), P = 0.84. Procedure- and fluoroscopy-time for group I versus group II was 193 ± 56 minutes versus 207 ± 27 and 33 ± 13 minutes versus 34 ± 11 minutes, respectively. Right phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) occurred in 3 pts (all group II, time to resolution: 128 ± 112 days). In 2 of these pts, PNP occurred during the second bonus application. CONCLUSION: Application of 2 when compared to 1 freeze-thaw cycle(s) following cryoballoon PVI did not result in improved clinical success but was associated with a higher complication rate.